Everest Forms
4.9100,000+
vs
Fluent Forms
4.7500,000+
vs
Quform
4.7N/A

Quick Verdict

Choose Everest Forms if...

Budget-conscious site owners who want a generous free version with entry management, plus affordable lifetime licensing for long-term value.

Choose Fluent Forms if...

Value-conscious developers and agencies who want maximum features at minimum cost, especially those already using FluentCRM.

Choose Quform if...

Developers who prefer a one-time payment model and need a reliable, well-coded form builder without subscription overhead.

Feature Comparison

FeatureEverest FormsFluent FormsQuform
Drag & Drop Builder
Conditional Logic
Multi-Step Forms
File Uploads
Payment Forms
Calculated Fields
User Registration
Frontend Post Submission
Conversational Forms
Gutenberg Block
Gutenberg-Native
AI Form Builder
Digital Signatures
Surveys & Polls
Quizzes
Scheduling / Date Limits
Entry Management
Export Entries
Partial Entries
Geolocation
Webhooks
Custom CSS
Responsive Design
Ajax Submission
Anti-Spam
reCAPTCHA
hCaptcha
Cloudflare Turnstile
Honeypot

Pricing Comparison

PlanEverest FormsFluent FormsQuform
Free VersionFreeFree
Starting Price$49/year$79/year$34 one-time
Top TierAgency: $199/yearUnlimited: $299/yearRegular License: $34
Lifetime DealFrom $199From $279

Integrations

Email Marketing

activecampaign
aweber
brevo
campaign monitor
constant contact
convertkit
drip
getresponse
klaviyo
mailchimp
mailerlite
mailpoet
moosend

Payment

mollie
paypal
razorpay
square
stripe

CRM

hubspot
pipedrive
salesforce
zoho

Automation

google sheets
make
uncanny automator
webhooks
zapier

Other

fluentcrm
google calendar
google sheets
pdf export
slack
telegram
twilio

Pros & Cons

Everest Forms

Pros

  • Generous free version — entry management, file uploads, and CSV export included at no cost
  • Lifetime deals available starting at $199 — strong long-term value
  • 4.9-star WordPress.org rating reflects excellent user satisfaction and support
  • Comprehensive anti-spam — reCAPTCHA, hCaptcha, Turnstile, honeypot, Akismet, and CleanTalk
  • Rich CRM integrations — HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoho, Pipedrive all natively supported

Cons

  • Not Gutenberg-native — uses its own builder, only provides an embed block
  • Conditional logic requires pro — unlike Fluent Forms which offers it free
  • Smaller user base (100K) means fewer community tutorials and third-party resources
  • Only ~6 templates in the free version; full library requires pro
  • AI builder requires external OpenAI API key — not a true built-in generator

Fluent Forms

Pros

  • Conditional logic available in free version (competitors charge for this)
  • Lightest frontend scripts of all major plugins (<42KB)
  • Conversational forms included
  • Lifetime deal available — excellent for agencies
  • Part of the WPManageNinja ecosystem (FluentCRM, FluentBooking integration)

Cons

  • Not Gutenberg-native (uses its own builder)
  • No native Salesforce integration
  • Template library smaller than WPForms (75 vs 2,100+)
  • Some integrations not updated regularly
  • No geolocation

Quform

Pros

  • One-time payment model ($34) — no annual subscription renewal
  • Clean, developer-friendly codebase
  • Conditional logic, multi-step forms, and file uploads included
  • Good CodeCanyon rating (4.7) and long track record
  • hCaptcha and Cloudflare Turnstile support

Cons

  • No free version or trial
  • Sold through Envato/CodeCanyon — outside standard WordPress plugin ecosystem
  • No calculated fields, payments, partial entries, or user registration
  • No signatures or quizzes
  • Updates may slow if ThemeCatcher development priorities change

Related