Formello vs Ninja Forms vs WS Form (2026)
Quick Verdict
Choose Formello if...
Developers who need a simple, lightweight Gutenberg-native form for projects where long-term plugin support is not a concern.
Choose Ninja Forms if...
WordPress users who want a free core and only need to pay for specific features as they grow.
Choose WS Form if...
Agencies and developers who want the most powerful, flexible form builder and are willing to invest time in learning it.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Formello | Ninja Forms | WS Form |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drag & Drop Builder | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conditional Logic | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-Step Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| File Uploads | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Payment Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calculated Fields | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| User Registration | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Frontend Post Submission | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conversational Forms | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Gutenberg Block | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gutenberg-Native | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| AI Form Builder | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Digital Signatures | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Surveys & Polls | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quizzes | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scheduling / Date Limits | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Entry Management | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Export Entries | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Partial Entries | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Geolocation | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom CSS | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Responsive Design | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ajax Submission | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Spam | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| reCAPTCHA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| hCaptcha | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cloudflare Turnstile | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Honeypot | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Formello | Ninja Forms | WS Form |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Version | ✓Free | ✓Free | ✓Free |
| Starting Price | $49/year | $99/year | $59/year |
| Top Tier | Pro: $49/year | Elite: $499/year | Agency: $249/year |
Integrations
Email Marketing
| activecampaign | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| aweber | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| brevo | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| campaign monitor | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| constant contact | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| convertkit | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| getresponse | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| mailchimp | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| mailerlite | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| mailpoet | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
Payment
| paypal | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| stripe | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| woocommerce | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
CRM
| hubspot | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| salesforce | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| zoho | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
Automation
| make | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| webhooks | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| zapier | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Other
| debug console | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| google sheets | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| rest api | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| slack | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| twilio | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Formello
Pros
- ✓True Gutenberg-native experience
- ✓Lightweight and developer-friendly
- ✓Webhooks and basic integrations
- ✓Entry management included
Cons
- ✗Slow update cadence — last updated May 2025, raises maintenance concerns
- ✗No multi-step forms, file uploads, payments, calculated fields, surveys, or user registration
- ✗Pricing page may be broken — unclear if Pro version is still actively sold
- ✗Very small install base (500+)
- ✗No Turnstile support
Ninja Forms
Pros
- ✓Free core plugin with genuinely useful features (calculated fields included free)
- ✓Calculated fields available in the free version — unlike most competitors
- ✓Modular add-on model lets you pay only for what you need
- ✓Good developer extensibility with hooks and filters
- ✓Easy drag-and-drop interface suitable for beginners
Cons
- ✗Add-on model gets expensive quickly if you need multiple features
- ✗Not Gutenberg-native (uses its own drag-and-drop builder)
- ✗No conversational forms or signatures
- ✗Heavy first-party scripts compared to Fluent Forms
- ✗Renewal pricing after first-year discount is a common complaint
WS Form
Pros
- ✓Most feature-complete form plugin in the space — nearly everything is included
- ✓55+ field types (more than any competitor)
- ✓Unique Debug Console for developers
- ✓Exceptional support reputation (incredible support cited by multiple users)
- ✓High-quality built-in styler for form design
Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve than Fluent Forms or WPForms
- ✗Not Gutenberg-native — uses its own separate builder interface
- ✗Smaller install base (10K+) may concern some users regarding long-term viability
- ✗Less community content (tutorials, third-party resources) due to smaller user base