Quick Verdict
Choose CoBlocks Forms if...
Sites that only need a simple Contact Us form with no data storage requirements.
Choose Fluent Forms if...
Value-conscious developers and agencies who want maximum features at minimum cost, especially those already using FluentCRM.
Choose Formidable Forms if...
Developers and agencies who need to turn form submissions into data-driven front-end applications — directories, job boards, real estate listings, etc.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | CoBlocks Forms | Fluent Forms | Formidable Forms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drag & Drop Builder | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conditional Logic | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-Step Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| File Uploads | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Payment Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calculated Fields | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| User Registration | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Frontend Post Submission | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conversational Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gutenberg Block | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gutenberg-Native | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| AI Form Builder | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Digital Signatures | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surveys & Polls | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quizzes | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scheduling / Date Limits | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Entry Management | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Export Entries | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Partial Entries | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Geolocation | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom CSS | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Responsive Design | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ajax Submission | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Spam | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| reCAPTCHA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| hCaptcha | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cloudflare Turnstile | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Honeypot | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | CoBlocks Forms | Fluent Forms | Formidable Forms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Version | ✓Free | ✓Free | ✓Free |
| Starting Price | Free only | $79/year | $39.5/year |
| Top Tier | — | Unlimited: $299/year | Elite: $299.5/year |
| Lifetime Deal | ✗ | From $279 | ✗ |
Integrations
Email Marketing
| activecampaign | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| aweber | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| brevo | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| constant contact | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| convertkit | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| drip | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| getresponse | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| mailchimp | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| mailerlite | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| mailpoet | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
Payment
| mollie | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| paypal | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| razorpay | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| square | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| stripe | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| woocommerce | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
CRM
| hubspot | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| salesforce | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| zoho | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Automation
| make | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| uncanny automator | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| zapier | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Other
| fluentcrm | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| google sheets | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| recaptcha | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| slack | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| telegram | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| twilio | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
CoBlocks Forms
Pros
- ✓Completely free, no upsells
- ✓Pure Gutenberg-native — zero learning curve for Gutenberg users
- ✓Very lightweight
- ✓Good for simple Name / Email / Message contact forms
Cons
- ✗No entries saved to database — email only (major data loss risk)
- ✗No conditional logic, payments, file uploads, or any advanced feature
- ✗No integrations beyond reCAPTCHA
- ✗Backed by GoDaddy — some community concern about long-term direction
Fluent Forms
Pros
- ✓Conditional logic available in free version (competitors charge for this)
- ✓Lightest frontend scripts of all major plugins (<42KB)
- ✓Conversational forms included
- ✓Lifetime deal available — excellent for agencies
- ✓Part of the WPManageNinja ecosystem (FluentCRM, FluentBooking integration)
Cons
- ✗Not Gutenberg-native (uses its own builder)
- ✗No native Salesforce integration
- ✗Template library smaller than WPForms (75 vs 2,100+)
- ✗Some integrations not updated regularly
- ✗No geolocation
Formidable Forms
Pros
- ✓Unique Formidable Views feature turns entries into directories, calendars, and front-end apps
- ✓Calculated fields and complex formula support
- ✓Swiss Army Knife versatility — handles everything from simple forms to full web apps
- ✓Free version available on WordPress.org
- ✓Built-in survey tools rivaling SurveyMonkey
Cons
- ✗Most advanced features locked behind Business ($199.50/yr)
- ✗Steeper learning curve for the Views/app-builder features
- ✗CSS customization can be tricky without developer knowledge
- ✗No Gutenberg-native experience
- ✗Support quality can be inconsistent per user reviews