Fluent Forms
4.7500,000+
vs
Ninja Forms
4.4600,000+

Quick Verdict

Choose Fluent Forms if...

Value-conscious developers and agencies who want maximum features at minimum cost, especially those already using FluentCRM.

Choose Ninja Forms if...

WordPress users who want a free core and only need to pay for specific features as they grow.

Feature Comparison

FeatureFluent FormsNinja Forms
Drag & Drop Builder
Conditional Logic
Multi-Step Forms
File Uploads
Payment Forms
Calculated Fields
User Registration
Frontend Post Submission
Conversational Forms
Gutenberg Block
Gutenberg-Native
AI Form Builder
Digital Signatures
Surveys & Polls
Quizzes
Scheduling / Date Limits
Entry Management
Export Entries
Partial Entries
Geolocation
Webhooks
Custom CSS
Responsive Design
Ajax Submission
Anti-Spam
reCAPTCHA
hCaptcha
Cloudflare Turnstile
Honeypot

Pricing Comparison

PlanFluent FormsNinja Forms
Free VersionFreeFree
Starting Price$79/year$99/year
Top TierUnlimited: $299/yearElite: $499/year
Lifetime DealFrom $279

Integrations

Email Marketing

activecampaign
aweber
brevo
campaign monitor
constant contact
convertkit
drip
getresponse
mailchimp
mailerlite
mailpoet

Payment

mollie
paypal
razorpay
square
stripe

CRM

hubspot
salesforce
zoho

Automation

make
uncanny automator
zapier

Other

fluentcrm
google sheets
slack
telegram
twilio

Pros & Cons

Fluent Forms

Pros

  • Conditional logic available in free version (competitors charge for this)
  • Lightest frontend scripts of all major plugins (<42KB)
  • Conversational forms included
  • Lifetime deal available — excellent for agencies
  • Part of the WPManageNinja ecosystem (FluentCRM, FluentBooking integration)

Cons

  • Not Gutenberg-native (uses its own builder)
  • No native Salesforce integration
  • Template library smaller than WPForms (75 vs 2,100+)
  • Some integrations not updated regularly
  • No geolocation

Ninja Forms

Pros

  • Free core plugin with genuinely useful features (calculated fields included free)
  • Calculated fields available in the free version — unlike most competitors
  • Modular add-on model lets you pay only for what you need
  • Good developer extensibility with hooks and filters
  • Easy drag-and-drop interface suitable for beginners

Cons

  • Add-on model gets expensive quickly if you need multiple features
  • Not Gutenberg-native (uses its own drag-and-drop builder)
  • No conversational forms or signatures
  • Heavy first-party scripts compared to Fluent Forms
  • Renewal pricing after first-year discount is a common complaint

Related