CoBlocks Forms vs Formidable Forms vs Happyforms (2026)
Quick Verdict
Choose CoBlocks Forms if...
Sites that only need a simple Contact Us form with no data storage requirements.
Choose Formidable Forms if...
Developers and agencies who need to turn form submissions into data-driven front-end applications — directories, job boards, real estate listings, etc.
Choose Happyforms if...
Non-technical site owners who want a friendly form-building experience with live preview and solid email marketing integrations.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | CoBlocks Forms | Formidable Forms | Happyforms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drag & Drop Builder | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conditional Logic | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-Step Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| File Uploads | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Payment Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calculated Fields | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| User Registration | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Frontend Post Submission | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Conversational Forms | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Gutenberg Block | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gutenberg-Native | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| AI Form Builder | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Digital Signatures | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surveys & Polls | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quizzes | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scheduling / Date Limits | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Entry Management | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Export Entries | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Partial Entries | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Geolocation | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom CSS | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Responsive Design | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ajax Submission | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Spam | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| reCAPTCHA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| hCaptcha | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloudflare Turnstile | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Honeypot | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | CoBlocks Forms | Formidable Forms | Happyforms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Version | ✓Free | ✓Free | ✓Free |
| Starting Price | Free only | $39.5/year | $89/year |
| Top Tier | — | Elite: $299.5/year | Unlimited: $399/year |
Integrations
Email Marketing
| activecampaign | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| aweber | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| brevo | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| constant contact | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| convertkit | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| getresponse | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| mailchimp | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| mailerlite | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| mailpoet | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| sendfox | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| sendgrid | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Payment
| paypal | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| stripe | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| woocommerce | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
CRM
| hubspot | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| salesforce | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| zoho | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
Automation
| integrately | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| make | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| uncanny automator | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| zapier | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Other
| google analytics | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| google sheets | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| recaptcha | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| slack | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
CoBlocks Forms
Pros
- ✓Completely free, no upsells
- ✓Pure Gutenberg-native — zero learning curve for Gutenberg users
- ✓Very lightweight
- ✓Good for simple Name / Email / Message contact forms
Cons
- ✗No entries saved to database — email only (major data loss risk)
- ✗No conditional logic, payments, file uploads, or any advanced feature
- ✗No integrations beyond reCAPTCHA
- ✗Backed by GoDaddy — some community concern about long-term direction
Formidable Forms
Pros
- ✓Unique Formidable Views feature turns entries into directories, calendars, and front-end apps
- ✓Calculated fields and complex formula support
- ✓Swiss Army Knife versatility — handles everything from simple forms to full web apps
- ✓Free version available on WordPress.org
- ✓Built-in survey tools rivaling SurveyMonkey
Cons
- ✗Most advanced features locked behind Business ($199.50/yr)
- ✗Steeper learning curve for the Views/app-builder features
- ✗CSS customization can be tricky without developer knowledge
- ✗No Gutenberg-native experience
- ✗Support quality can be inconsistent per user reviews
Happyforms
Pros
- ✓Unique live-preview building experience via WordPress Customizer
- ✓Wide email marketing integration (10+ providers)
- ✓Payments (Stripe + PayPal) and signatures included in Pro
- ✓Save and Resume feature for long forms
- ✓Generous free plan on WordPress.org for basic forms
Cons
- ✗No calculated fields, user registration, or quizzes
- ✗No webhooks
- ✗No hCaptcha or Turnstile (only reCAPTCHA)
- ✗Smaller install base (40K) vs. major competitors
- ✗Customizer-based workflow may feel dated vs. Gutenberg-native approach